Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Addition towards difference between the rental income received by the assessee from M/s.CFD, a partnership firm and rental income received by the partnership firm, M/s.CFD from three tenants - The tribunal sided with the trust, ruling that the Assessing Officer erred in attributing additional rental income to the trust, as the sub-leases were based on substantial enhancements made by the lessee, justifying higher rents from sub-tenants.
Addition towards difference between the rental income received by the assessee from M/s.CFD, a partnership firm and rental income received by the partnership firm, M/s.CFD from three tenants - The tribunal sided with the trust, ruling that the Assessing Officer erred in attributing additional rental income to the trust, as the sub-leases were based on substantial enhancements made by the lessee, justifying higher rents from sub-tenants.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.