Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1381 to 1400 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Revocation of the Customs Broker Licence - The appellant argued that the license had already been revoked once and reinstated by the Tribunal, making the subsequent revocation unjustified. The Department alleged violations under various provisions of the Customs Act and Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations. However, the Tribunal found no merit in the Department's allegations, highlighting discrepancies in the application of relevant provisions and logistical challenges at the Land Customs Station. Ultimately, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and restoring the appellant's license.
Revocation of the Customs Broker Licence - The appellant argued that the license had already been revoked once and reinstated by the Tribunal, making the subsequent revocation unjustified. The Department alleged violations under various provisions of the Customs Act and Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations. However, the Tribunal found no merit in the Department's allegations, highlighting discrepancies in the application of relevant provisions and logistical challenges at the Land Customs Station. Ultimately, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and restoring the appellant's license.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.