Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Demand of differential service tax - Valuation - non-inclusion on reimbursable expenses - pure agent services - The Appellate Tribunal analyzed the agreements and legal provisions, including previous tribunal decisions and the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006. It concluded that the appellant indeed acted as a pure agent and that reimbursable expenses should not be considered part of taxable services. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with consequential relief.
Demand of differential service tax - Valuation - non-inclusion on reimbursable expenses - pure agent services - The Appellate Tribunal analyzed the agreements and legal provisions, including previous tribunal decisions and the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006. It concluded that the appellant indeed acted as a pure agent and that reimbursable expenses should not be considered part of taxable services. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with consequential relief.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
