Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Entitlement for issuance of C-Forms post the introduction of G.S.T. regime for natural gas - The High court extensively reviewed the applicability of C-Forms in the post-GST regime and reaffirmed that despite the GST implementation, certain transactions still fell under the purview of the CST Act due to the continued definition of some goods like natural gas. It was determined that the petitioner was entitled to the concessional rate of 2% if it provided the necessary C-Forms. The court also noted the confusion and transitional issues between the VAT and GST systems, which affected the submission of these forms. The court ultimately ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the tax authorities to process the refund based on the C-Forms submitted.
Entitlement for issuance of C-Forms post the introduction of G.S.T. regime for natural gas - The High court extensively reviewed the applicability of C-Forms in the post-GST regime and reaffirmed that despite the GST implementation, certain transactions still fell under the purview of the CST Act due to the continued definition of some goods like natural gas. It was determined that the petitioner was entitled to the concessional rate of 2% if it provided the necessary C-Forms. The court also noted the confusion and transitional issues between the VAT and GST systems, which affected the submission of these forms. The court ultimately ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the tax authorities to process the refund based on the C-Forms submitted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
