Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Benefit of Exemption from CST - stock transfer or inter-state sale - The petitioner argued for the exemption of tax under Section 6A of the CST Act, contending that the movement constituted stock transfer. However, the respondent argued that the goods were tailor-made for specific customers, invoiced directly to them, and thus constituted inter-state sales taxable under Section 3(a) of the CST Act. The High Court upheld the respondent's argument, emphasizing the tailor-made nature of the goods and the direct invoicing to customers. Additionally, the court dismissed the petitioner's argument regarding the prospective applicability of Section 6A(3), affirming the jurisdiction and authority for revision under Section 9(2) of the CST Act.
Benefit of Exemption from CST - stock transfer or inter-state sale - The petitioner argued for the exemption of tax under Section 6A of the CST Act, contending that the movement constituted stock transfer. However, the respondent argued that the goods were tailor-made for specific customers, invoiced directly to them, and thus constituted inter-state sales taxable under Section 3(a) of the CST Act. The High Court upheld the respondent's argument, emphasizing the tailor-made nature of the goods and the direct invoicing to customers. Additionally, the court dismissed the petitioner's argument regarding the prospective applicability of Section 6A(3), affirming the jurisdiction and authority for revision under Section 9(2) of the CST Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
