Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Levying penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The appellant, a partner in a partnership firm, had disclosed all particulars of income, including remuneration and interest on capitals received from the firm, in the original return filed. Despite the incorrect claim made under section 44AD of the Act, the Tribunal found no evidence of concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars. Relying on legal precedents and considering the disclosure made by the appellant, the Tribunal concluded that the penalty was unwarranted.
Levying penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The appellant, a partner in a partnership firm, had disclosed all particulars of income, including remuneration and interest on capitals received from the firm, in the original return filed. Despite the incorrect claim made under section 44AD of the Act, the Tribunal found no evidence of concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars. Relying on legal precedents and considering the disclosure made by the appellant, the Tribunal concluded that the penalty was unwarranted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
