Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Levy of service tax - business support service - making facility to the customers to book online tickets of movies and other shows - The Appellate Tribunal found that the appellant did not receive any consideration from the card companies for providing business support services. Since no invoices were raised by the appellant against the services rendered to the card companies, the Tribunal concluded that no consideration was received. This aligned with the principle that consideration must be present for a service to be taxed. The Tribunal observed that the appellant had not retained any amount received from the card companies. Instead, these amounts were intended to be paid to cinema houses. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal.
Levy of service tax - business support service - making facility to the customers to book online tickets of movies and other shows - The Appellate Tribunal found that the appellant did not receive any consideration from the card companies for providing business support services. Since no invoices were raised by the appellant against the services rendered to the card companies, the Tribunal concluded that no consideration was received. This aligned with the principle that consideration must be present for a service to be taxed. The Tribunal observed that the appellant had not retained any amount received from the card companies. Instead, these amounts were intended to be paid to cinema houses. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
