Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Levy of service tax - business support service - making facility to the customers to book online tickets of movies and other shows - The Appellate Tribunal found that the appellant did not receive any consideration from the card companies for providing business support services. Since no invoices were raised by the appellant against the services rendered to the card companies, the Tribunal concluded that no consideration was received. This aligned with the principle that consideration must be present for a service to be taxed. The Tribunal observed that the appellant had not retained any amount received from the card companies. Instead, these amounts were intended to be paid to cinema houses. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal.
Levy of service tax - business support service - making facility to the customers to book online tickets of movies and other shows - The Appellate Tribunal found that the appellant did not receive any consideration from the card companies for providing business support services. Since no invoices were raised by the appellant against the services rendered to the card companies, the Tribunal concluded that no consideration was received. This aligned with the principle that consideration must be present for a service to be taxed. The Tribunal observed that the appellant had not retained any amount received from the card companies. Instead, these amounts were intended to be paid to cinema houses. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
