Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Addition of bogus sales - difference in opinion between learned Members constituting the bench - The appellate tribunal (Third Member) addressed the dispute arising from alleged bogus sales transactions during the demonetization period. The Assessing Officer treated these transactions as unexplained cash credit under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. However, the Tribunal found that the assessee sufficiently proved the authenticity of the sales through meticulous record-keeping and documentary evidence, despite challenges such as non-responses from some parties and allegations of sham transactions. - The Third Member upheld the decision of the learned Accountant Member to reject the addition under Section 68, considering the adequacy of evidence presented by the assessee.
Addition of bogus sales - difference in opinion between learned Members constituting the bench - The appellate tribunal (Third Member) addressed the dispute arising from alleged bogus sales transactions during the demonetization period. The Assessing Officer treated these transactions as unexplained cash credit under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. However, the Tribunal found that the assessee sufficiently proved the authenticity of the sales through meticulous record-keeping and documentary evidence, despite challenges such as non-responses from some parties and allegations of sham transactions. - The Third Member upheld the decision of the learned Accountant Member to reject the addition under Section 68, considering the adequacy of evidence presented by the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
