Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Computation of LTCG u/s. 50C - leasehold right on land acquired - valuation of properties - The ITAT meticulously analyzed the nature of leasehold versus freehold properties and affirmed that Section 50C is applicable only to "land or building or both", not extending to leasehold interests which are fundamentally different in nature due to their restricted and limited rights. - The Tribunal also addressed the submission related to the first and second provisos to Section 50C concerning the valuation of properties based on agreements and their registration dates. It was emphasized that the agreement date and the actual consideration should guide the capital gains computation, especially when a discrepancy exists between the agreement date and registration date values. - Ultimately, the Tribunal supported the respondent's position by ruling that leasehold rights in land do not fall under the ambit of Section 50C.
Computation of LTCG u/s. 50C - leasehold right on land acquired - valuation of properties - The ITAT meticulously analyzed the nature of leasehold versus freehold properties and affirmed that Section 50C is applicable only to "land or building or both", not extending to leasehold interests which are fundamentally different in nature due to their restricted and limited rights. - The Tribunal also addressed the submission related to the first and second provisos to Section 50C concerning the valuation of properties based on agreements and their registration dates. It was emphasized that the agreement date and the actual consideration should guide the capital gains computation, especially when a discrepancy exists between the agreement date and registration date values. - Ultimately, the Tribunal supported the respondent's position by ruling that leasehold rights in land do not fall under the ambit of Section 50C.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
