Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Additions (Benefit) u/s 28(iv) - Expenditure incurred by the HO for salary paid to the expatriate employees for rendering services to PE - The tribunal upheld the allowance of salary expenses paid to expatriate employees, rejecting the revenue's argument under Section 28(iv) of the Income Tax Act that unrecorded expenses should lead to deemed income. The tribunal agreed that since these expenses had already been subjected to tax as salary income in the employees' returns, they did not constitute a benefit under Section 28(iv).
Additions (Benefit) u/s 28(iv) - Expenditure incurred by the HO for salary paid to the expatriate employees for rendering services to PE - The tribunal upheld the allowance of salary expenses paid to expatriate employees, rejecting the revenue's argument under Section 28(iv) of the Income Tax Act that unrecorded expenses should lead to deemed income. The tribunal agreed that since these expenses had already been subjected to tax as salary income in the employees' returns, they did not constitute a benefit under Section 28(iv).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.