Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Mechanical approval under search assessment law vitiates assessments when sanction lacks application of mind; retrospective curative provision cannot ...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Additions (Benefit) u/s 28(iv) - Expenditure incurred by the HO for salary paid to the expatriate employees for rendering services to PE - The tribunal upheld the allowance of salary expenses paid to expatriate employees, rejecting the revenue's argument under Section 28(iv) of the Income Tax Act that unrecorded expenses should lead to deemed income. The tribunal agreed that since these expenses had already been subjected to tax as salary income in the employees' returns, they did not constitute a benefit under Section 28(iv).
Additions (Benefit) u/s 28(iv) - Expenditure incurred by the HO for salary paid to the expatriate employees for rendering services to PE - The tribunal upheld the allowance of salary expenses paid to expatriate employees, rejecting the revenue's argument under Section 28(iv) of the Income Tax Act that unrecorded expenses should lead to deemed income. The tribunal agreed that since these expenses had already been subjected to tax as salary income in the employees' returns, they did not constitute a benefit under Section 28(iv).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.