Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
Public servant status under anti-corruption law extends to recognised stock exchange leadership; constitutional and sanction challenges do not succeed...
Acquiescence, homebuyer protection and clean-slate resolution principles prevent landowners from disrupting an integrated project through late termina...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1001 to 1020 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Professional Misconduct by CA - The NFRA found that the auditors neglected their duty to perform an independent and thorough audit. They overlooked critical signals of potential financial irregularities communicated by the previously resigned auditor and failed to investigate or challenge the company's management on these points. The auditors issued an audit report that included an EoM paragraph suggesting no significant issues under section 143(12) of the Companies Act, which was misleading given the substantial evidence to the contrary. A monetary penalty of ₹3 crore was imposed on M/s Pathak H.D. & Associates. - Separate penalties imposed on EP and EQCR Partners.
Professional Misconduct by CA - The NFRA found that the auditors neglected their duty to perform an independent and thorough audit. They overlooked critical signals of potential financial irregularities communicated by the previously resigned auditor and failed to investigate or challenge the company's management on these points. The auditors issued an audit report that included an EoM paragraph suggesting no significant issues under section 143(12) of the Companies Act, which was misleading given the substantial evidence to the contrary. A monetary penalty of ₹3 crore was imposed on M/s Pathak H.D. & Associates. - Separate penalties imposed on EP and EQCR Partners.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
