Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Objective characteristics govern magnesium bis-glycinate chelate classification as an amino-acid coordination compound, not a food preparation or anti...
Independent professional certification requires pleaded knowledge or complicity for criminal liability; untimely complaints remain barred by limitatio...
Levy of service tax - Intellectual Property Services - The Tribunal observed that the technology transfer did not qualify as intellectual property rights under Section 65(55a) of the Act, as it was confidential and not registered under Indian law. Therefore, it did not fall under the definition of intellectual property services as per Section 65(55b). Referring to past cases and Circular No. 80/2010/2004-S.T., the Tribunal concluded that the appellant was not liable to pay service tax on the license fees and incidental expenses to the Russian company.
Levy of service tax - Intellectual Property Services - The Tribunal observed that the technology transfer did not qualify as intellectual property rights under Section 65(55a) of the Act, as it was confidential and not registered under Indian law. Therefore, it did not fall under the definition of intellectual property services as per Section 65(55b). Referring to past cases and Circular No. 80/2010/2004-S.T., the Tribunal concluded that the appellant was not liable to pay service tax on the license fees and incidental expenses to the Russian company.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
