Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Point of Taxation rules - Liability for service tax on provisional entries made for services received from an associated enterprise located outside India. - The Tribunal notes that up to April 2012, tax should be paid based on the date of credit or payment, whichever is earlier. Post-April 2012, the rule changed to the date of debit or payment. The Tribunal acknowledged that provisional entries are a reasonable basis for determining tax liability due to statutory amendments aimed at curtailing tax avoidance. - The Tribunal remanded the case to the original authority to reassess the tax and penalties based on actual figures and compliance with statutory provisions.
Point of Taxation rules - Liability for service tax on provisional entries made for services received from an associated enterprise located outside India. - The Tribunal notes that up to April 2012, tax should be paid based on the date of credit or payment, whichever is earlier. Post-April 2012, the rule changed to the date of debit or payment. The Tribunal acknowledged that provisional entries are a reasonable basis for determining tax liability due to statutory amendments aimed at curtailing tax avoidance. - The Tribunal remanded the case to the original authority to reassess the tax and penalties based on actual figures and compliance with statutory provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.