Transfer pricing comparability requires functional alignment, reliable financial data, and careful review of working capital and receivables adjustmen...
Transfer pricing rules require benchmarking corporate guarantees and associated-enterprise advances, while invalid domestic-transaction adjustments ca...
Prospective sugar export prohibition required registered letters of credit; private contracts and export quotas created no enforceable continuation ri...
Retroactive interim-moratorium exclusion permits protective asset disclosure and preservation measures against personal guarantors pending arbitration...
Jurisdiction to issue show cause notice and initiate proceedings under GST - Director General of GST (Intelligence) - proper Officer - The High Court acknowledges the inspection conducted at the petitioner's premises, where it was found that taxable goods were supplied without appropriate GST payment or fulfillment of conditions for exemption. The Court rules that the impugned proceedings were issued by the competent authority, as per Circular dated 09.02.2018, which designates officers of the Director General of GST (Intelligence) to issue show cause notices. - Regarding the petitioner's argument on the applicability of Circular No.23/2021, the Court clarifies that it pertains to state GST officers and does not bind central tax officers. Therefore, the impugned proceedings are valid.
Jurisdiction to issue show cause notice and initiate proceedings under GST - Director General of GST (Intelligence) - proper Officer - The High Court acknowledges the inspection conducted at the petitioner's premises, where it was found that taxable goods were supplied without appropriate GST payment or fulfillment of conditions for exemption. The Court rules that the impugned proceedings were issued by the competent authority, as per Circular dated 09.02.2018, which designates officers of the Director General of GST (Intelligence) to issue show cause notices. - Regarding the petitioner's argument on the applicability of Circular No.23/2021, the Court clarifies that it pertains to state GST officers and does not bind central tax officers. Therefore, the impugned proceedings are valid.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.