Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Captive power transfer pricing and non-resident export commission rules support deletion of adjustments and withholding disallowance in discussed proc...
Page of 4782
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
401 to 420 of 95636 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Jurisdiction to issue show cause notice and initiate proceedings under GST - Director General of GST (Intelligence) - proper Officer - The High Court acknowledges the inspection conducted at the petitioner's premises, where it was found that taxable goods were supplied without appropriate GST payment or fulfillment of conditions for exemption. The Court rules that the impugned proceedings were issued by the competent authority, as per Circular dated 09.02.2018, which designates officers of the Director General of GST (Intelligence) to issue show cause notices. - Regarding the petitioner's argument on the applicability of Circular No.23/2021, the Court clarifies that it pertains to state GST officers and does not bind central tax officers. Therefore, the impugned proceedings are valid.
Jurisdiction to issue show cause notice and initiate proceedings under GST - Director General of GST (Intelligence) - proper Officer - The High Court acknowledges the inspection conducted at the petitioner's premises, where it was found that taxable goods were supplied without appropriate GST payment or fulfillment of conditions for exemption. The Court rules that the impugned proceedings were issued by the competent authority, as per Circular dated 09.02.2018, which designates officers of the Director General of GST (Intelligence) to issue show cause notices. - Regarding the petitioner's argument on the applicability of Circular No.23/2021, the Court clarifies that it pertains to state GST officers and does not bind central tax officers. Therefore, the impugned proceedings are valid.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.