Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) - The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's argument regarding the timing of the return filing, emphasizing that the amended provision did not apply retrospectively to the assessment year in question. Regarding the alleged failure to claim deduction in the belated return, the Tribunal found that the claim was indeed made, thus dismissing the Revenue's contention.
Deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) - The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's argument regarding the timing of the return filing, emphasizing that the amended provision did not apply retrospectively to the assessment year in question. Regarding the alleged failure to claim deduction in the belated return, the Tribunal found that the claim was indeed made, thus dismissing the Revenue's contention.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
