Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Summons issued to attend the office of the DRI - seeking permission for presence of their advocate and videography of the Petitioner’s interrogation - The High court allowed the petitioner's advocate to be present during interrogation, maintaining a visible but not audible distance. Additionally, the court permitted videography of the interrogation, with costs to be borne by the petitioner. However, the court emphasized that the absence of the advocate or videographer would not excuse the petitioner from attending the interrogation.
Summons issued to attend the office of the DRI - seeking permission for presence of their advocate and videography of the Petitioner’s interrogation - The High court allowed the petitioner's advocate to be present during interrogation, maintaining a visible but not audible distance. Additionally, the court permitted videography of the interrogation, with costs to be borne by the petitioner. However, the court emphasized that the absence of the advocate or videographer would not excuse the petitioner from attending the interrogation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
