Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
861 to 880 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Money Laundering - provisional attachment order - Despite claiming innocence and presenting evidence of legitimate business transactions, the appellant's receipt of payments through non-existing companies raised suspicions. The Appellate Tribunal, while acknowledging the appellant's denial of involvement in criminal activities, upheld the attachment order due to insufficient evidence supporting innocence. The appellant was advised to pursue legal remedies against the alleged fraudulent party. Overall, the Tribunal found no grounds to intervene in the attachment order.
Money Laundering - provisional attachment order - Despite claiming innocence and presenting evidence of legitimate business transactions, the appellant's receipt of payments through non-existing companies raised suspicions. The Appellate Tribunal, while acknowledging the appellant's denial of involvement in criminal activities, upheld the attachment order due to insufficient evidence supporting innocence. The appellant was advised to pursue legal remedies against the alleged fraudulent party. Overall, the Tribunal found no grounds to intervene in the attachment order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.