Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
Public servant status under anti-corruption law extends to recognised stock exchange leadership; constitutional and sanction challenges do not succeed...
Acquiescence, homebuyer protection and clean-slate resolution principles prevent landowners from disrupting an integrated project through late termina...
Denial of Input Tax Credit (ITC) - Proof of movement of Goods (E-way bill) not produced - The High court acknowledges that the petitioner submitted original tax invoices, ledger accounts, bank statements, and relevant GSTR returns to support their position. However, they did not provide e-way bills, lorry receipts, or weighment slips to establish the actual movement of goods. The court notes that while the tax proposal was confirmed largely due to lack of proof of actual movement of goods, the documents submitted by the petitioner, including bank statements and GSTR 2A, indicated the availability of ITC. Thus, it deems it appropriate to provide the petitioner with an opportunity to produce additional documents to prove actual movement of goods. Matter restored back.
Denial of Input Tax Credit (ITC) - Proof of movement of Goods (E-way bill) not produced - The High court acknowledges that the petitioner submitted original tax invoices, ledger accounts, bank statements, and relevant GSTR returns to support their position. However, they did not provide e-way bills, lorry receipts, or weighment slips to establish the actual movement of goods. The court notes that while the tax proposal was confirmed largely due to lack of proof of actual movement of goods, the documents submitted by the petitioner, including bank statements and GSTR 2A, indicated the availability of ITC. Thus, it deems it appropriate to provide the petitioner with an opportunity to produce additional documents to prove actual movement of goods. Matter restored back.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
