Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Denial of Input Tax Credit (ITC) - Proof of movement of Goods (E-way bill) not produced - The High court acknowledges that the petitioner submitted original tax invoices, ledger accounts, bank statements, and relevant GSTR returns to support their position. However, they did not provide e-way bills, lorry receipts, or weighment slips to establish the actual movement of goods. The court notes that while the tax proposal was confirmed largely due to lack of proof of actual movement of goods, the documents submitted by the petitioner, including bank statements and GSTR 2A, indicated the availability of ITC. Thus, it deems it appropriate to provide the petitioner with an opportunity to produce additional documents to prove actual movement of goods. Matter restored back.
Denial of Input Tax Credit (ITC) - Proof of movement of Goods (E-way bill) not produced - The High court acknowledges that the petitioner submitted original tax invoices, ledger accounts, bank statements, and relevant GSTR returns to support their position. However, they did not provide e-way bills, lorry receipts, or weighment slips to establish the actual movement of goods. The court notes that while the tax proposal was confirmed largely due to lack of proof of actual movement of goods, the documents submitted by the petitioner, including bank statements and GSTR 2A, indicated the availability of ITC. Thus, it deems it appropriate to provide the petitioner with an opportunity to produce additional documents to prove actual movement of goods. Matter restored back.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.