Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Validity Of Order passed u/s 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [“the Act”] - Demand of GST - The Delhi High Court addressed a case wherein the petitioner contested an order creating a demand against them without the issuance of a show cause notice or DRC-01 beforehand. Acknowledging the absence of such notices, the Court ruled that the impugned order, purportedly passed under Section 73 of the CGST Act, violated procedural requirements. Consequently, the Court quashed the order, emphasizing the necessity of adhering to principles of natural justice. - The Court clarified that it would be open to the respondents to pass an appropriate order after giving a proper show cause notice and an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner.
Validity Of Order passed u/s 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [“the Act”] - Demand of GST - The Delhi High Court addressed a case wherein the petitioner contested an order creating a demand against them without the issuance of a show cause notice or DRC-01 beforehand. Acknowledging the absence of such notices, the Court ruled that the impugned order, purportedly passed under Section 73 of the CGST Act, violated procedural requirements. Consequently, the Court quashed the order, emphasizing the necessity of adhering to principles of natural justice. - The Court clarified that it would be open to the respondents to pass an appropriate order after giving a proper show cause notice and an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
