Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Deduction u/s 10 B - The AO argued that the units were formed by the transfer of previously used machinery, disqualifying them from certain deductions. - The tribunal, however, noted that the CIT(A) had provided a detailed examination of the history and operations of these units, establishing that they were indeed new undertakings that satisfied the statutory requirements for the deduction under Section 10B. - One of the significant issues was whether the sales proceeds of exported goods were received in India within the prescribed time frame to qualify for exemptions under Section 10B. The tribunal found that despite minor discrepancies in documentation, the majority of proceeds were indeed received within the permissible period, thus supporting the assessee's claim for deduction.
Deduction u/s 10 B - The AO argued that the units were formed by the transfer of previously used machinery, disqualifying them from certain deductions. - The tribunal, however, noted that the CIT(A) had provided a detailed examination of the history and operations of these units, establishing that they were indeed new undertakings that satisfied the statutory requirements for the deduction under Section 10B. - One of the significant issues was whether the sales proceeds of exported goods were received in India within the prescribed time frame to qualify for exemptions under Section 10B. The tribunal found that despite minor discrepancies in documentation, the majority of proceeds were indeed received within the permissible period, thus supporting the assessee's claim for deduction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
