Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The petitioner had initially failed to file income tax returns but later submitted various documents in response to notices received under the Income Tax Act. Despite this, the assessment order did not consider the documents submitted by the petitioner, nor did it provide reasons for the proposed variations. The court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the tax authorities for reconsideration.
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The petitioner had initially failed to file income tax returns but later submitted various documents in response to notices received under the Income Tax Act. Despite this, the assessment order did not consider the documents submitted by the petitioner, nor did it provide reasons for the proposed variations. The court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the tax authorities for reconsideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.