Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Determining the jurisdiction of appellate forum - jurisdiction of this Tribunal - The Tribunal refers to the legal precedent established in a Supreme Court case regarding the jurisdiction of appellate forums, emphasizing that the "situs of the assessing officer" is the determining factor regardless of administrative orders. Since the location of the Assessing Officer falls outside the Tribunal's territorial jurisdiction, the appeal is deemed not maintainable. Therefore, the Tribunal dismisses both the Revenue's appeal and the assessee's cross objection, granting them the option to file before the appropriate bench with jurisdiction over the Assessing Officer's location.
Determining the jurisdiction of appellate forum - jurisdiction of this Tribunal - The Tribunal refers to the legal precedent established in a Supreme Court case regarding the jurisdiction of appellate forums, emphasizing that the "situs of the assessing officer" is the determining factor regardless of administrative orders. Since the location of the Assessing Officer falls outside the Tribunal's territorial jurisdiction, the appeal is deemed not maintainable. Therefore, the Tribunal dismisses both the Revenue's appeal and the assessee's cross objection, granting them the option to file before the appropriate bench with jurisdiction over the Assessing Officer's location.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.