Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
The Appellate Tribunal addressed three main issues raised by the Assessee against the assessment order. Firstly, regarding the disallowance of job work charges to a sister concern, the Tribunal found that the authorities failed to conduct a comparative study, leading to the deletion of the disallowance. Secondly, the adhoc disallowance on job work charges was deemed unjustified due to lack of evidence supporting the Assessing Officer's decision, resulting in its deletion. Finally, the addition of duty drawback incentive was dismissed as the Assessee was not aggrieved by the issue and relief was already provided by the CIT(A).
The Appellate Tribunal addressed three main issues raised by the Assessee against the assessment order. Firstly, regarding the disallowance of job work charges to a sister concern, the Tribunal found that the authorities failed to conduct a comparative study, leading to the deletion of the disallowance. Secondly, the adhoc disallowance on job work charges was deemed unjustified due to lack of evidence supporting the Assessing Officer's decision, resulting in its deletion. Finally, the addition of duty drawback incentive was dismissed as the Assessee was not aggrieved by the issue and relief was already provided by the CIT(A).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.