Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Insolvency and BankruptcyApril 17, 2024Case LawsAT
CIRP - Liquidation of corporate debtor - Refusal to approve the private sale - The Tribunal acknowledged the procedural challenges presented by the liquidator’s initiation of a private sale, which was contested by another interested party leading to the Adjudicating Authority's decision to allow more bidders to participate, ensuring a competitive process to maximize asset recovery. The Tribunal found that despite the withdrawal of one of the interested parties, the original decision to seek more bids was justified given the potential for higher recovery. It was held that the auction process should proceed with a fresh notice and the opportunity for all interested parties, including those who had expressed earlier interests, to participate.
CIRP - Liquidation of corporate debtor - Refusal to approve the private sale - The Tribunal acknowledged the procedural challenges presented by the liquidator’s initiation of a private sale, which was contested by another interested party leading to the Adjudicating Authority's decision to allow more bidders to participate, ensuring a competitive process to maximize asset recovery. The Tribunal found that despite the withdrawal of one of the interested parties, the original decision to seek more bids was justified given the potential for higher recovery. It was held that the auction process should proceed with a fresh notice and the opportunity for all interested parties, including those who had expressed earlier interests, to participate.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
