Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Insolvency and BankruptcyApril 17, 2024Case LawsAT
CIRP - Liquidation of corporate debtor - Refusal to approve the private sale - The Tribunal acknowledged the procedural challenges presented by the liquidator’s initiation of a private sale, which was contested by another interested party leading to the Adjudicating Authority's decision to allow more bidders to participate, ensuring a competitive process to maximize asset recovery. The Tribunal found that despite the withdrawal of one of the interested parties, the original decision to seek more bids was justified given the potential for higher recovery. It was held that the auction process should proceed with a fresh notice and the opportunity for all interested parties, including those who had expressed earlier interests, to participate.
CIRP - Liquidation of corporate debtor - Refusal to approve the private sale - The Tribunal acknowledged the procedural challenges presented by the liquidator’s initiation of a private sale, which was contested by another interested party leading to the Adjudicating Authority's decision to allow more bidders to participate, ensuring a competitive process to maximize asset recovery. The Tribunal found that despite the withdrawal of one of the interested parties, the original decision to seek more bids was justified given the potential for higher recovery. It was held that the auction process should proceed with a fresh notice and the opportunity for all interested parties, including those who had expressed earlier interests, to participate.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
