Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 95872 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Seeking release of petitioner - Right to Sleep - The High Court found that the petitioner was not detained when he entered the Enforcement Directorate (ED) office under Section 50 summons of the PMLA. The arrest was deemed legal as per Section 19 of the PMLA, and the petitioner was produced before the Special Court within 24 hours. - While acknowledging the importance of the right to sleep, the Court noted that the petitioner's statement was recorded voluntarily, albeit at an inconvenient hour. The Court deprecated the practice of recording statements post-midnight and directed the ED to issue guidelines for the timing of statement recordings under Section 50 of the PMLA.
Seeking release of petitioner - Right to Sleep - The High Court found that the petitioner was not detained when he entered the Enforcement Directorate (ED) office under Section 50 summons of the PMLA. The arrest was deemed legal as per Section 19 of the PMLA, and the petitioner was produced before the Special Court within 24 hours. - While acknowledging the importance of the right to sleep, the Court noted that the petitioner's statement was recorded voluntarily, albeit at an inconvenient hour. The Court deprecated the practice of recording statements post-midnight and directed the ED to issue guidelines for the timing of statement recordings under Section 50 of the PMLA.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
