Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Characterization of receipt - amount received by the appellant upon retirement from the partnership - taxability as capital gains under the Income Tax or not? - The High Court agrees with the appellant's argument that the amount received by her upon retirement, being the balance of her capital account in the firm, does not qualify as a transfer for the purpose of capital gains taxation. It concurs with the principle that the adjustment of rights of partners in a dissolved firm, through the distribution of assets, does not amount to a transfer. - Regarding the receipt of the share value of goodwill, the High Court holds that in the absence of a clear transfer of goodwill to the firm by the appellant, such receipt cannot be taxed as capital gains.
Characterization of receipt - amount received by the appellant upon retirement from the partnership - taxability as capital gains under the Income Tax or not? - The High Court agrees with the appellant's argument that the amount received by her upon retirement, being the balance of her capital account in the firm, does not qualify as a transfer for the purpose of capital gains taxation. It concurs with the principle that the adjustment of rights of partners in a dissolved firm, through the distribution of assets, does not amount to a transfer. - Regarding the receipt of the share value of goodwill, the High Court holds that in the absence of a clear transfer of goodwill to the firm by the appellant, such receipt cannot be taxed as capital gains.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
