Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
TDS u/s 194C - Non deduction of TDS on payment to the persons who were not the owner of the vehicle - The Tribunal interpreted the term "owns" in section 194C(6) to encompass possession rather than strict registered ownership. Referring to section 44AE, which defines "owner" for the purpose of presumptive taxation, the Tribunal concluded that ownership includes possession of the goods carriage, not just registered ownership. Citing judicial precedents and the intention of the legislature to provide benefits to taxpayers, the Tribunal determined that the appellant complied with section 194C(6) by obtaining declarations from those in possession of the goods carriages and making payments accordingly.
TDS u/s 194C - Non deduction of TDS on payment to the persons who were not the owner of the vehicle - The Tribunal interpreted the term "owns" in section 194C(6) to encompass possession rather than strict registered ownership. Referring to section 44AE, which defines "owner" for the purpose of presumptive taxation, the Tribunal concluded that ownership includes possession of the goods carriage, not just registered ownership. Citing judicial precedents and the intention of the legislature to provide benefits to taxpayers, the Tribunal determined that the appellant complied with section 194C(6) by obtaining declarations from those in possession of the goods carriages and making payments accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
