Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Insolvency and BankruptcyApril 16, 2024Case LawsAT
Interest on deposit - sale consideration amount deposited by the appellant - The Tribunal acknowledged the regulations stipulating that payments made after thirty days attract a 12% interest rate. However, it noted that the Liquidator’s hands were tied due to the NCLT’s restraining order, preventing the issuance of the Sale Certificate until specific approvals were obtained. Citing Supreme Court precedents, the Tribunal discussed the entitlement to interest and the principles of equity and restitution but ultimately noted that these did not apply under the circumstances where the Sale Certificate’s issuance was delayed by judicial intervention rather than administrative oversight.
Interest on deposit - sale consideration amount deposited by the appellant - The Tribunal acknowledged the regulations stipulating that payments made after thirty days attract a 12% interest rate. However, it noted that the Liquidator’s hands were tied due to the NCLT’s restraining order, preventing the issuance of the Sale Certificate until specific approvals were obtained. Citing Supreme Court precedents, the Tribunal discussed the entitlement to interest and the principles of equity and restitution but ultimately noted that these did not apply under the circumstances where the Sale Certificate’s issuance was delayed by judicial intervention rather than administrative oversight.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
