Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Insolvency and BankruptcyApril 16, 2024Case LawsSCH
Amendment of section 7 application - time limitation - date of default - The Supreme Court addressed a case involving the correction of a date mentioned in a previous order and an amendment to a petition under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) 2016. The respondent sought an amendment to the petition, asserting that despite an initial default, subsequent events prevented the petition from being barred by limitation. The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) affirmed the order allowing the amendment but left the question of limitation open. The Supreme Court decided not to entertain the appeal, deferring all aspects regarding limitation to the NCLT.
Amendment of section 7 application - time limitation - date of default - The Supreme Court addressed a case involving the correction of a date mentioned in a previous order and an amendment to a petition under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) 2016. The respondent sought an amendment to the petition, asserting that despite an initial default, subsequent events prevented the petition from being barred by limitation. The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) affirmed the order allowing the amendment but left the question of limitation open. The Supreme Court decided not to entertain the appeal, deferring all aspects regarding limitation to the NCLT.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
