Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1381 to 1400 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
SVLDRS - Benefit of the Amnesty Scheme opted - failure to make payment on account of technical glitch or not - Despite the appellant's assertion of technical glitches, an affidavit from the Assistant Director of GST and Central Excise indicated that there were no attempts by the appellant to make payments on the specified dates. - The High Court rejected the appellant's claim of technical glitches, emphasizing the appellant's awareness of the deadline and his failure to attempt payment within the extended period. It deemed the appellant ineligible for relief under the Amnesty Scheme.
SVLDRS - Benefit of the Amnesty Scheme opted - failure to make payment on account of technical glitch or not - Despite the appellant's assertion of technical glitches, an affidavit from the Assistant Director of GST and Central Excise indicated that there were no attempts by the appellant to make payments on the specified dates. - The High Court rejected the appellant's claim of technical glitches, emphasizing the appellant's awareness of the deadline and his failure to attempt payment within the extended period. It deemed the appellant ineligible for relief under the Amnesty Scheme.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.