Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Page of 4816
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1461 to 1480 of 96301 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Territorial Jurisdiction - seeking transfer of place of investigation - The petitioner cited inconvenience due to the distance between their headquarters in Thiruvananthapuram and the location of the investigation in Kasaragod. However, the court found no compelling reason to grant the transfer, noting that Kasaragod is within the boundaries of Kerala. Consequently, the court dismissed this plea. - On the matter of expediting the advance ruling application, the court noted that the application was relatively recent, filed in January 2024. Therefore, the court declined to intervene and compel the advance ruling authority to expedite the decision.
Territorial Jurisdiction - seeking transfer of place of investigation - The petitioner cited inconvenience due to the distance between their headquarters in Thiruvananthapuram and the location of the investigation in Kasaragod. However, the court found no compelling reason to grant the transfer, noting that Kasaragod is within the boundaries of Kerala. Consequently, the court dismissed this plea. - On the matter of expediting the advance ruling application, the court noted that the application was relatively recent, filed in January 2024. Therefore, the court declined to intervene and compel the advance ruling authority to expedite the decision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.