Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Quantification of pre-deposit of 20% before filing an appeal - Disputed tax amount includes demand of interest or not - The High Court examined the relevant provisions and noted that the requirement for pre-deposit mentioned in Section 112(8)(b) does not include interest. It observed a clear distinction in the provision, specifying the pre-deposit amount as 20% of the remaining tax in dispute. The High Court found merit in the appellant's argument and set aside the portion of the order directing the petitioners to pay 20% of the remaining interest. It further directed the respondents not to initiate any recovery proceedings until the writ petition is heard and disposed of.
Quantification of pre-deposit of 20% before filing an appeal - Disputed tax amount includes demand of interest or not - The High Court examined the relevant provisions and noted that the requirement for pre-deposit mentioned in Section 112(8)(b) does not include interest. It observed a clear distinction in the provision, specifying the pre-deposit amount as 20% of the remaining tax in dispute. The High Court found merit in the appellant's argument and set aside the portion of the order directing the petitioners to pay 20% of the remaining interest. It further directed the respondents not to initiate any recovery proceedings until the writ petition is heard and disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
