Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Condonation of delay in filing returns - due to ill-health, returns (GSTR-3B) could not be filed within the time prescribed by the second respondent - The petitioner, relying on Section 62(2) of the State Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, argued that the assessment order should be withdrawn since the returns were filed within 30 days from the receipt of the order, as per the amendment extending the time limit to 60 days. - The Court acknowledged the petitioner's argument and directed them to file an application to condone the delay within 15 days. Upon filing the application, the respondents were instructed to consider the reasons provided for the delay and permit the filing of revised returns accordingly.
Condonation of delay in filing returns - due to ill-health, returns (GSTR-3B) could not be filed within the time prescribed by the second respondent - The petitioner, relying on Section 62(2) of the State Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, argued that the assessment order should be withdrawn since the returns were filed within 30 days from the receipt of the order, as per the amendment extending the time limit to 60 days. - The Court acknowledged the petitioner's argument and directed them to file an application to condone the delay within 15 days. Upon filing the application, the respondents were instructed to consider the reasons provided for the delay and permit the filing of revised returns accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
