Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Validity of assessment order of GST demand - Violation of principles of natural justice - Admittedly, notice in Form DRC-01 was issued after conducting an inspection based on the advertisement made by the petitioner in the Indiamart.com. The respondent has not identified any finished goods in the petitioner's premises as claimed by them. - The High court emphasized the importance of providing a proper opportunity of hearing before making any adverse decisions, as mandated by the GST Act. Consequently, the impugned assessment orders were set aside, and the matter was remanded back to the authorities for fresh consideration, with a directive to afford the petitioner a personal hearing and to consider their submissions adequately.
Validity of assessment order of GST demand - Violation of principles of natural justice - Admittedly, notice in Form DRC-01 was issued after conducting an inspection based on the advertisement made by the petitioner in the Indiamart.com. The respondent has not identified any finished goods in the petitioner's premises as claimed by them. - The High court emphasized the importance of providing a proper opportunity of hearing before making any adverse decisions, as mandated by the GST Act. Consequently, the impugned assessment orders were set aside, and the matter was remanded back to the authorities for fresh consideration, with a directive to afford the petitioner a personal hearing and to consider their submissions adequately.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
