Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
SVLDRS - The High Court acknowledged that the petitioner's duty liability was admitted and quantified before the cutoff date of 30.06.2019, as evidenced by records from the audit proceedings. The Court interpreted Section 125(1)(e) and Section 121(r) in conjunction with the CBIC Circular, emphasizing that admissions recorded during the audit process constituted a written communication of the duty payable. - It held that the rejection of the petitioner's declaration solely based on the date of issuance of the final audit report was not tenable, considering the clarification provided by the CBIC.
SVLDRS - The High Court acknowledged that the petitioner's duty liability was admitted and quantified before the cutoff date of 30.06.2019, as evidenced by records from the audit proceedings. The Court interpreted Section 125(1)(e) and Section 121(r) in conjunction with the CBIC Circular, emphasizing that admissions recorded during the audit process constituted a written communication of the duty payable. - It held that the rejection of the petitioner's declaration solely based on the date of issuance of the final audit report was not tenable, considering the clarification provided by the CBIC.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
