Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The Appellate Tribunal found that the PCIT's assumption of jurisdiction under Section 263 was not justified. It observed that the assessment order was not erroneous, as the Assessing Officer had accepted the returned income and made no additions based on the reasons recorded for reopening the assessment. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the PCIT's order and restored that of the Assessing Officer.
Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The Appellate Tribunal found that the PCIT's assumption of jurisdiction under Section 263 was not justified. It observed that the assessment order was not erroneous, as the Assessing Officer had accepted the returned income and made no additions based on the reasons recorded for reopening the assessment. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the PCIT's order and restored that of the Assessing Officer.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
