Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4823
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96456 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Undervaluation and Mis-declaration of the goods imported - The tribunal found that the values used in the SCNs were improperly based on an unadjudicated earlier SCN. Since this earlier SCN was still under adjudication, its findings could not be used to substantiate new demands. The lack of a personal hearing and the reliance on preliminary findings from an unadjudicated SCN were seen as breaches of procedural justice. - The case was remanded for a fresh hearing, to be conducted in conjunction with or subsequent to the adjudication of the earlier SCN, ensuring adherence to the principles of natural justice.
Undervaluation and Mis-declaration of the goods imported - The tribunal found that the values used in the SCNs were improperly based on an unadjudicated earlier SCN. Since this earlier SCN was still under adjudication, its findings could not be used to substantiate new demands. The lack of a personal hearing and the reliance on preliminary findings from an unadjudicated SCN were seen as breaches of procedural justice. - The case was remanded for a fresh hearing, to be conducted in conjunction with or subsequent to the adjudication of the earlier SCN, ensuring adherence to the principles of natural justice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.