Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Rejection of branch transfer / Stock transfer of Goods - The tribunal found that the tax authority inappropriately applied a general conclusion from a small subset of transactions to all transfers, without adequate individual evidence. - The tribunal referenced several precedents that clarify when a movement of goods between states constitutes a sale versus a transfer. The key determination hinges on whether there is a direct link between customer orders and the movement of goods. - Ultimately, the tribunal sided with the company for most of the disputed transactions, reversing the additional tax demand. It held that the burden of proof to demonstrate that these were not branch transfers but sales rested with the State, which it failed to meet except in a limited number of transactions.
Rejection of branch transfer / Stock transfer of Goods - The tribunal found that the tax authority inappropriately applied a general conclusion from a small subset of transactions to all transfers, without adequate individual evidence. - The tribunal referenced several precedents that clarify when a movement of goods between states constitutes a sale versus a transfer. The key determination hinges on whether there is a direct link between customer orders and the movement of goods. - Ultimately, the tribunal sided with the company for most of the disputed transactions, reversing the additional tax demand. It held that the burden of proof to demonstrate that these were not branch transfers but sales rested with the State, which it failed to meet except in a limited number of transactions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.