Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Rejection of branch transfer / Stock transfer of Goods - The tribunal found that the tax authority inappropriately applied a general conclusion from a small subset of transactions to all transfers, without adequate individual evidence. - The tribunal referenced several precedents that clarify when a movement of goods between states constitutes a sale versus a transfer. The key determination hinges on whether there is a direct link between customer orders and the movement of goods. - Ultimately, the tribunal sided with the company for most of the disputed transactions, reversing the additional tax demand. It held that the burden of proof to demonstrate that these were not branch transfers but sales rested with the State, which it failed to meet except in a limited number of transactions.
Rejection of branch transfer / Stock transfer of Goods - The tribunal found that the tax authority inappropriately applied a general conclusion from a small subset of transactions to all transfers, without adequate individual evidence. - The tribunal referenced several precedents that clarify when a movement of goods between states constitutes a sale versus a transfer. The key determination hinges on whether there is a direct link between customer orders and the movement of goods. - Ultimately, the tribunal sided with the company for most of the disputed transactions, reversing the additional tax demand. It held that the burden of proof to demonstrate that these were not branch transfers but sales rested with the State, which it failed to meet except in a limited number of transactions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
