Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Refund of IGST on goods exported - The High court found the denial of the IGST refund, based on the administrative discrepancies between the ICEGATE and GST Common Portals, to be legally unsustainable. It held that the petitioner's exports were eligible for a refund under the provisions of the CGST and IGST Acts, emphasizing the procedural rights of exporters to claim refunds for zero-rated supplies. Recognizing the petitioner's entitlement to the refund and the undue delay caused by the authorities, the court awarded interest on the refund amount, underlining the state's accountability in adhering to statutory timelines for refunds.
Refund of IGST on goods exported - The High court found the denial of the IGST refund, based on the administrative discrepancies between the ICEGATE and GST Common Portals, to be legally unsustainable. It held that the petitioner's exports were eligible for a refund under the provisions of the CGST and IGST Acts, emphasizing the procedural rights of exporters to claim refunds for zero-rated supplies. Recognizing the petitioner's entitlement to the refund and the undue delay caused by the authorities, the court awarded interest on the refund amount, underlining the state's accountability in adhering to statutory timelines for refunds.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.