Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Validity of Referring the matter to DVO - Additions based on valuation report - The High Court noted that the assessee had filed its return for the relevant assessment year supported by audited books of accounts. The AO, without rejecting these books, referred the matter to the DVO. The High Court observed that the books of accounts were not rejected before a certain date, and the rejection occurred later based on the DVO's report. Citing precedent, the High Court emphasized that the AO could not refer the matter to the DVO without first rejecting the books of account. - The High Court upheld the ITAT's decision to delete the addition made by the AO based on the valuation report. It reiterated that the reference to the DVO was not lawful, and therefore, the estimation made by the DVO could not be relied upon for making the assessment.
Validity of Referring the matter to DVO - Additions based on valuation report - The High Court noted that the assessee had filed its return for the relevant assessment year supported by audited books of accounts. The AO, without rejecting these books, referred the matter to the DVO. The High Court observed that the books of accounts were not rejected before a certain date, and the rejection occurred later based on the DVO's report. Citing precedent, the High Court emphasized that the AO could not refer the matter to the DVO without first rejecting the books of account. - The High Court upheld the ITAT's decision to delete the addition made by the AO based on the valuation report. It reiterated that the reference to the DVO was not lawful, and therefore, the estimation made by the DVO could not be relied upon for making the assessment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
