Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Assessment u/s 153A - Addition made on account of over invoicing in purchases - protective addition - The Tribunal meticulously examined the evidence and submissions presented by both parties. It found the statements obtained during the search to be unreliable, lacking corroborative evidence and contradicted by subsequent actions of the assessee. Additionally, the Tribunal criticized the comparison of purchase prices undertaken by the AO, highlighting its flawed nature and absence of legal authority. Ultimately, the Tribunal concluded that the addition made by the AO on account of alleged over-invoicing was unsustainable. It directed the AO to delete the addition across all assessment years.
Assessment u/s 153A - Addition made on account of over invoicing in purchases - protective addition - The Tribunal meticulously examined the evidence and submissions presented by both parties. It found the statements obtained during the search to be unreliable, lacking corroborative evidence and contradicted by subsequent actions of the assessee. Additionally, the Tribunal criticized the comparison of purchase prices undertaken by the AO, highlighting its flawed nature and absence of legal authority. Ultimately, the Tribunal concluded that the addition made by the AO on account of alleged over-invoicing was unsustainable. It directed the AO to delete the addition across all assessment years.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.