Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Insolvency and BankruptcyApril 12, 2024Case LawsAT
Approval of Resolution Plan - Validity of the order of Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) wherein it held that Rishima cannot be called as a Financial Creditor and Rishima being a Decree Holder of a foreign award can be treated as other creditor. The application of the respondent was partly allowed by the Adjudicating Authority - The Appellate Tribunal, in its decision, focused on the approval of the Resolution Plan by the Adjudicating Authority. Despite the ongoing dispute regarding the nature and status of the foreign arbitral award obtained by Rishima, the Resolution Plan allocated a nominal amount to Rishima's claim. The Tribunal concluded that the Resolution Plan had effectively addressed the issues raised in the appeal, rendering further consideration unnecessary. As a result, the appeal was dismissed.
Approval of Resolution Plan - Validity of the order of Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) wherein it held that Rishima cannot be called as a Financial Creditor and Rishima being a Decree Holder of a foreign award can be treated as other creditor. The application of the respondent was partly allowed by the Adjudicating Authority - The Appellate Tribunal, in its decision, focused on the approval of the Resolution Plan by the Adjudicating Authority. Despite the ongoing dispute regarding the nature and status of the foreign arbitral award obtained by Rishima, the Resolution Plan allocated a nominal amount to Rishima's claim. The Tribunal concluded that the Resolution Plan had effectively addressed the issues raised in the appeal, rendering further consideration unnecessary. As a result, the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
