Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Point of taxation - Continuous supply - The appellant contended that their service contract with ONGC was a continuous supply of service and that the point of taxation had not been triggered, as they had not yet delivered oil/gas to ONGC. They argued that the activities undertaken were intermediate steps toward fulfilling the contract's scope and did not constitute a taxable service per se, as they had not yet received consideration for the supposed services rendered. - The tribunal found merit in the appellant's arguments, emphasizing the nature of the contract as a continuous supply of service, where taxation could only be applied upon the completion of specific milestones. - Demadn of service tax set aside.
Point of taxation - Continuous supply - The appellant contended that their service contract with ONGC was a continuous supply of service and that the point of taxation had not been triggered, as they had not yet delivered oil/gas to ONGC. They argued that the activities undertaken were intermediate steps toward fulfilling the contract's scope and did not constitute a taxable service per se, as they had not yet received consideration for the supposed services rendered. - The tribunal found merit in the appellant's arguments, emphasizing the nature of the contract as a continuous supply of service, where taxation could only be applied upon the completion of specific milestones. - Demadn of service tax set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.