Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Confiscation of goods - Clandestine removal of bunkers - import of duty free Furnace Oil & HSD Fuel Oil under warehouse procedure - The tribunal conducted a thorough analysis of the procedural aspects related to the duty-free import, warehousing, and subsequent supply of the bunker fuel to foreign going vessels. It noted the appellants' compliance with the requisite customs procedures, including the filing of warehousing bonds and undertaking as per Section 59 of the Customs Act, 1962 - Ultimately, the tribunal found that the department failed to establish the charge of diversion with cogent evidence. It underscored that serious allegations such as clandestine removal and diversion necessitate robust proof, which was conspicuously absent in this case.
Confiscation of goods - Clandestine removal of bunkers - import of duty free Furnace Oil & HSD Fuel Oil under warehouse procedure - The tribunal conducted a thorough analysis of the procedural aspects related to the duty-free import, warehousing, and subsequent supply of the bunker fuel to foreign going vessels. It noted the appellants' compliance with the requisite customs procedures, including the filing of warehousing bonds and undertaking as per Section 59 of the Customs Act, 1962 - Ultimately, the tribunal found that the department failed to establish the charge of diversion with cogent evidence. It underscored that serious allegations such as clandestine removal and diversion necessitate robust proof, which was conspicuously absent in this case.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
